Allowed

Rajesh Durgaprasad Mishra v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC3 Nov 2023ABA/3118/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted pre-arrest bail to the applicant in a case involving offences under Sections 354, 323, 504, and 506 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The court issued specific conditions for bail and confined its observations to the grant of relief.

What did the court decide?

Relief: Grant of pre-arrest bail upon furnishing a PR bond of Rs. 30,000 with one or two sureties, subject to conditions for attendance and non-interference with evidence.

Rajesh Durgaprasad Mishra Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

2023:BHC-AS:33640

¶2

908 aba 3118 of 2023.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3118 OF 2023

¶4

… Rajesh Durgaprasad Mishra Applicant

¶5

versus

¶6

The State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶7

Mr. Mukesh Pandey, for Applicant. Mr. M.G.Patil, APP for State. Mr. Balwant V. Salunkhe, for Complainant. First informant present.

¶8

CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. DATE : 3 NOVEMBER 2023

¶9

P.C.

¶10

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

¶11

This is an application for pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R.No.866

¶12

of 2023 registered with Pelhar Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 354, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The first informant lodged a report with the allegations that on 16 September 2023, the applicant had came to her house and asked her to give water for drinking. When she went to another room, the applicant caught hold of her and tore off her blouse and thereby outraged her modesty. The co-accused entered into her house and abused and assaulted her.

¶14

The learned Counsel for the first informant, on the instructions of the

¶15

first informant, who is present in Court, submitted that the first informant has no

¶16

SSP 1/3

¶17

908 aba 3118 of 2023.doc

¶18

objection to grant pre-arrest bail to the Applicant.

¶19

Prima facie, it appears that a scuffle had occurred between the first informant and the applicant and co-accused. The question as to whether in the said scuffle, the applicant had used criminal force with an intent to outrage the modesty of the first informant would be a matter for adjudication. The applicant appears to have roots in society. The possibility of fleeing away from justice appears to be remote. I am, therefore, persuaded to exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant.

¶20

Hence, the following order :

¶21

(i) In the event of the arrest of the Applicant – Rajesh Durgaprasad

¶22

Mishra in connection with C.R.No.866 of 2023 registered with Pelhar Police Station,

¶23

the Applicant be released on bail on furnishing a PR bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/with one or two sureties in the like amount.

¶24

(ii) The Applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and report

¶25

to Pelhar Police Station on 9^th and 10^th November 2023 in between 10.00 a.m. to 1.00

¶26

p.m.

¶27

(iii) The Applicant shall not contact the first informant and shall not

¶28

tamper with the prosecution evidence and/or give threat or inducement to any of the prosecution witnesses and the persons acquainted with the facts of the case.

¶29

(iv) The Applicant shall regularly attend the proceedings before the

¶30

SSP 2/3

¶31

908 aba 3118 of 2023.doc

¶32

jurisdictional Court.

¶33

(v) The Application stands disposed.

¶34

(vi) It is clarified that these prima facie observations are confined to

¶35

determine the entitlement to pre-arrest bail only.

¶36

( N.J.JAMADAR, J. )

¶37

SSP 3/3

Rajesh Durgaprasad Mishra v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Durgaprasad Mishra v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akshay Balasaheb Badade Vs the State of Maharashtra

Pankesh Kalyan Tandel Vs Union Territory of Dadra Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu

Rohan Balaso Jagtap Vs the State of Maharashtra

Amina Salim Shaikh Vs State of Maharashtra

Abdul Kalam Jafar Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mohammed Salman Kapadia Vs the State of Maharashtra