Arif Mainuddin Bargir v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Single Judge rejected two anticipatory bail applications. The Court found the applicant habitual in duping persons by cheating regarding vehicle transactions and held custodial interrogation necessary to unearth similar crimes.
What the court decided
915.aba-1742-23 @ aba-273-23.doc
SA Pathan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1742 OF 2023
Arif Bagir … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 273 OF 2023
Arif Mainuddin Bargir … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr.Aviraj S. Tavar, for the Applicant in ABA No.1742 of 2023.
Mr. Aviraj S. Tarar, for the Applicant in ABA No.273 of 2023.
Mrs. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the State-Respondent. Mr. Shrikant Shendge, API, Panvel City police station.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : JULY 5, 2023
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to an accused accused of habitual cheating in multiple pending cases.
Whether custodial interrogation is necessary to unearth similar occurrences of cheating.
Whether the rejection of bail applications was based on the applicant's antecedent conduct.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Arif Bagir
- applicant
Arif Mainuddin Bargir
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court