Satish Bhiva Arwel v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear before the court on the requisite dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1-ABA2028-2023.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2028 OF 2023
Satish Bhiva Arwel ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
None for the Applicant. Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, APP for the State/Respondent.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 25th OCTOBER, 2023
ORDER:-
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
1/1
Satish Bhiva Arwel
The State of Maharashtra
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court