High Court of Bombay dismissed an anticipatory bail application after the parties reached a settlement via mediation, making the interim protection order absolute.
Interim protection order made absolute on terms of settlement; anticipatory bail application and interim application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
45-ABA1928-2022+.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2023.09.06 14:46:53 +0530
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1928 OF 2022 WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2918 OF 2022
Prashant Ramesh Lohar and ors. ...Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. Tukaram Shendge, for the Applicants. Ms. Neha Ramesh Kokare, for the Intervenor. Mr. M. G. Patil, APP for the State.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2023
PC:-
1/2
45-ABA1928-2022+.DOC
stands disposed.
[ N. J. JAMADAR, J. ]
2/2
Santosh Subhash Kulkarni and ors.
The State of Maharashtra
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
