Allowed

Uday Jagannath Ghodke v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC10 Nov 2023ABA/1880/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay granted absolute bail to the applicant in an anticipatory bail application. The court noted the civil nature of the property dispute and that the major charge was theft in a dwelling house, finding custodial interrogation unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail order dated 06/07/2023 was made absolute with terms and conditions; applicant to regularly attend court proceedings.

Uday Jagannath Ghodke Vs State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

501-ABA1880-2023.DOC

¶2

Santosh

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1880 OF 2023

¶5

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI

¶6

Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2023.11.10 17:09:56 +0530

¶7

Uday Jagannath Ghodke ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. …Respondents

¶8

Mr. Harshad Nimbalkar, Senior Counsel a/w Abhishek Arote, Anup Lahoti and S. M. Sabu, for the Applicant.

¶9

Mr. M. G. Patil, APP for the State/Respondent.

¶10

Mr. Sunil Patil, a/w Piyush toshniwal, i/b Harshal Patil, for the Intervener.

¶11

CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. RESERVED ON: 18^th OCTOBER, 2023 PRONOUNCED ON: 10^th NOVEMBER, 2023

¶12

ORDER:-

¶13

Heard Mr. Nimbalkar, the learned Senior Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Patil, the learned APP for the State and Mr. Sunil Patil, the learned Counsel for the intervener.

¶14

This is an application for pre-arrest bail in connection with CR No.214 of 2022, registered with Paud Police Station, Pune Rural, initially for the offences punishable under Sections 441, 442, 445, 448, 324, 380 and 504 read with

¶15

Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“the Penal Code”).

¶16

1/5

¶17

501-ABA1880-2023.DOC

¶18

The gravamen of indictment against the applicant is that a property situated at Gat No.400 and the house bearing No.297 admeasuring 1000 sq. ft. standing thereon, is the ancestral property of the Brst informant and his co-sharers. The Brst informant had been in occupation and possession of the said property. In respect of the subject property proceedings bearing Special Civil Suit No.385 of 1990, Civil Appeal No.136 of 2019 and Special Civil Suit No.355 of 2011 are subjudice. On 26^th November, 2020 while the Brst informant had been to the house of his aunt at Palve (Budruk), District Nashik, the applicant allegedly taking undue advantage of the situation, in pursuance of a conspiracy with his associates, broke open the door of the Brst informant’s house and ransacked the house and committed theft of cash, ornaments and other valuable articles and, thereafter, put his own lock.

¶19

When the application was listed before the Court on 6^th July, 2023 this Court was persuaded to grant interim bail opining inter alia that registered Development Agreement and an order passed by this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No.1825 of 2023 dated 7^th June, 2023 prima facie indicated

¶20

2/5

¶21

501-ABA1880-2023.DOC

¶22

that the applicant was found to be in possession of the subject property.

¶23

The Court was informed the applicant has appeared before the Investigating OfBcer in terms of the directions contained in the said order.

¶24

The very allegations in the FIR, prima facie, indicate that the dispute between the parties is primarily of civil nature. At best, the applicant can be said to have committed trespass and theft. In the context of the allegations, the major offence seems to be of theft in a dwelling house, which entails punishment which may extend upto seven years. On this score, the discretion can be better exercised in favour of the accused.

¶25

On the merits of the matter, indisputably, a registered instrument has been executed in favour of the applicant on 25^th February, 2008. Special Civil Suit No.66 of 1999 instituted seeking a declaration for cancellation of Development Agreement and Sale Deed came to be dismissed

¶26

by the Civil Court at Pune by a judgment dated 28^th February, 2018. It further appears that the Block Development OfBcer, Panchayat Samiti, Mulshi, has rendered a decision on 25^th April, 2022 that property No.297

¶27

3/5

¶28

501-ABA1880-2023.DOC

¶29

admeasuring 1000 sq. ft. referred to in the FIR does not exist in Survey No.400. Thus, the entry of property No.297 be deleted from the assessment list (Form No.8).

¶30

In the backdrop of the pendency of various proceedings before the Civil and Revenue authorities, it may not be necessary to delve into the submissions sought to be canvassed on behalf of the Brst informant that bear upon proprietary and possessory title over the subject property. In the context of remit of this application, it would be sufBce to note that the custodial interrogation of the applicant is not warranted for further investigation.

¶31

I am, therefore, persuaded to make the order of interim bail absolute.

¶32

Hence the following order:

¶33

: O R D E R :

¶34

(i) The order of interim bail dated 6^th July, 2023 is made absolute on the terms and conditions incorporated therein.

¶35

(ii) In addition, the applicant shall regularly attend the proceedings before the jurisdictional Court.

¶36

(iii) Application stands disposed.

¶37

4/5

¶38

501-ABA1880-2023.DOC

¶39

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]

¶40

5/5

Uday Jagannath Ghodke v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uday Jagannath Ghodke v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Avinash Hindurao Olekar and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Deepak Sitaram Moghe Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Mahendra Shivaji Gunjal Vs State of Maharashtra

Kamilhusain Musaddik Shaikh Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Jayashree Vijaykumar Joglekar Vs Chandrashekhar Sitaram Joglekar and Another

Sagar Vitthal Balate and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra