Anticipatory bail application dismissed because the applicant failed to file an affidavit disclosing payments made to cheated farmers, rendering him unworthy of the court's discretion despite the nature of the offence.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed; observations confined to bail entitlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AS:37136
22 aba 1636 of 2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1636 OF 2023
Mohd. Shadab Mohd. Irfan
… Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra
… Respondent
Mr. Karim Pathan for Applicant. Mr. S.H.Yadav, APP for State.
CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. DATE : 11 DECEMBER 2023
P.C.
of 2023 registered with Tasgaon Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
SSP 1/2
22 aba 1636 of 2023.doc
made substantial payment and is willing to file an affidavit indicating the amount which is due and payable by him and the manner in which the applicant proposed to make amends.
( N.J.JAMADAR, J. )
SSP 2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether pre-arrest bail should be granted to an applicant who fails to disclose the amount allegedly paid to farmers and the details of the transaction.
Whether the alleged systematic deception of 21 farmers warrants denial of pre-arrest bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd. Shadab Mohd. Irfan
The State of Maharashtra
N.J.JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
