The applicant moved the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking anticipatory bail. The applicant's counsel withdrew the application on instructions. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AUG:26647
29-ABA-1598-2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1598 OF 2023
MANMATH SURYAKANT PARBATE
….Applicant
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
…..Respondent
...
Mr. G. N. Kulkarni (Mardikar), Advocate for the
Applicant.
Mr. M. K. Goyanka, Addl PP, for the Respondent – State.
...
CORAM:R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE:DECEMBER 18, 2023
PER COURT :
1.When this Court has shown its disinclination
to grant any relief, learned Counsel for the Applicant,on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the Application.
2. Application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
Malani
Page 1 of 1
Manmath Suryakant Parbate
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court