Allowed

Arun Pandharinath Thorat (Dismissed as Withdrawn as Per Order DT.17.05.2023) and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC29 Nov 2023ABA/1434/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court converted the order of interim bail into an absolute bail order for the applicants in a criminal case involving offences under the IPC and Maharashtra Police Act, noting their cooperation with investigation.

What did the court decide?

The order of interim bail dated 17th May, 2023 is made absolute on the terms and conditions incorporated therein.

Arun Pandharinath Thorat (Dismissed as Withdrawn as Per… — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

26-ABA1434-2023.DOC

¶2

Santosh

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1434 OF 2023

¶5

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI

¶6

Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2023.12.01 10:44:23 +0530

¶7

Arun Pandharinath Thorat and ors. ...Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra and anr. …Respondents

¶8

Mr. S. T. Pandey, a/w Arvind Singh, Anima Mishra, Ritu Singh, Anuj Singh, Kajal Upadhyay, Nagesh, i/b SBG Law Advocates, for the Applicants.

¶9

Smt. Ashwini Takalkar, APP for the State/Respondent. PSI Sukdeo Davan, Nashik Taluka Police Station,

¶10

CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 29^th NOVEMBER, 2023

¶11

ORDER:-

¶12

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicants and the learned APP for the State.

¶13

This is an application for pre-arrest bail in connection with CR No.138 of 2023, registered with Nashik Taluka Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 326, 323, 143, 147, 148, 149, 504 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“the Penal Code”) and Sections 37(1)(c) and 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

¶14

Initially, the application was preferred for accused No.1

¶15

Arun Thorat as well. When the application was listed before the Court on 17^th May, 2023, the application of applicant No.1

¶16

1/2

¶17

26-ABA1434-2023.DOC

¶18

Arun Thorat was not pressed and thereupon this Court was

¶19

persuaded to grant interim bail to applicant No.2 Sunil Thorat and applicant No.3 Kailas Thorat after ascribing reasons.

¶20

The learned Counsel for the applicants submits that accused No.1 Arun Thorat was arrested and has since been released on bail. The Court is informed that the applicants have appeared before the Investigating Officer and cooperated with the investigation.

¶21

The grievous hurt is prima facie attributable to the assault allegedly perpetrated by accused No.1 Arun Thorat.

¶22

In the aforesaid view of the matter especially having regard to the role attributed to the applicants, I am impelled to make the order of interim bail absolute.

¶23

Hence the following order:

¶24

(i) Order of interim bail dated 17^th May, 2023 is made absolute on the terms and conditions incorporated therein.

¶25

(ii) In addition, the applicants shall regularly attend the proceedings before the jurisdictional Court.

¶26

Application stands disposed.

¶27

2/2

Arun Pandharinath Thorat (Dismissed as Withdrawn as Per Order DT.17.05.2023) and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun Pandharinath Thorat (Dismissed as Withdrawn as Per Order DT.17.05.2023) and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Seema Rajendra Shelar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sagar Govind Shinde Vs State of Maharashtra

Siddhant @ Appu Vilas Gangurde Vs State of Maharashtra

Durgesh Pandurang Naik Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shraddha Vivek Singh Vs Upendra Kamalprasad Dubey and Anr.

Sameer Suleman Khan Vs State of Maharashtra