The High Court of Bombay heard an anticipatory bail application. Upon counsel's request and the Court's expression of disinclination, the applicant was granted leave to withdraw the application, which was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23_aba_1329_2023.odt
Megha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1329 OF 2023
Mrs. Reshma Yasin Shaikh...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra...Respondent
Mr. Sunil Lalla with Mr. Sandip Patil for the Applicant.
Mr. S.V. Gavand, APP for the Respondent -State.
Mr. Naveen Chomal for the Intervenor.
CORAM: SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.
DATED : 15th JUNE, 2023.
P. C. :-
1. Learned counsel for the Applicant, after arguing the matter
at length and when this Court expressed disinclination to grant relief,
seeks leave to withdraw the application. Leave is granted.
2. The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
1/1
Reshma Yasin Shaikh
State of Maharashtra
Anuja PrabhuDESSai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court