The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad, in an anticipatory bail application, permitted the applicant to withdraw the application after they sought time for instructions. The application was dismissed as withdrawn without any substantive ruling on the merits.
Leave granted to withdraw the anticipatory bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
973 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1299 OF 2023
VIKRAM JALINDAR JAGTAP
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shaikh Tarek Mobin H.
APP for Respondent / State : Mr. V.S. Badakh
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2023
PER COURT :
.On the earlier date when this Court had shown
disinclination to grant relief to the applicant, learned counsel for the
applicant sought time to take instructions from the applicant as
regards withdrawal of the application.
2.Today, learned counsel for the applicant on instructions
seeks leave to withdraw the application.
3.Leave granted. Application stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
[ R. M. JOSHI ]
JUDGE
1/1
GGP
VIKRAM JALINDAR JAGTAP
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
R. M. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court