Nazir Ansari v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
An anticipatory bail application was filed by the applicant apprehending arrest in a matrimonial dispute involving offences under IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act. The court confirmed interim bail granted earlier.
What did the court decide?
Confirmed interim bail and disposed of the application.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P.H. Jayani 32 ABA1110.2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1110 OF 2023
Mr. Nazir Ansari …. Applicant
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent
Mr. Mohd. Saeed Moghul a/w. Ms. Deepa Panicker for the Applicant.
Mr. R.M. Pethe, APP for the State.
Ms. Ameetha Kuttikrishnan, appointed by the Court for R.No.2.
Mr. Sachin Gadade, API, Sir J.J. Marg Police Station, present.
CORAM: SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.
DATED : 05th JUNE, 2023.
P. C. :-
.This is an Application under section 438 of Cr.P.C. filed by the
aforesaid Applicant apprehending his arrest in C.R.No.67/2023
registered with Sir. J.J. Marg Police Station, Mumbai for offences
punishable under sections 313, 323, 376(2)(f), 406, 498-A, 504, 506
r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of Dowry Prohibition
Act, 1961.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the facts constitute a fit case to exercise discretion under section 438 of Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mr. Nazir Ansari
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Anuja Prabhudessai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court