Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous after charge-sheet filing. Applicant offered cooperation without fear of custody. No bail granted due to procedural supersession.
Application disposed of as infautious; no bail ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1076 OF 2023
Nasreen Abdul Razzaq Qadri ...Applicant Versus The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Ashwinikumar Pathak , for the Applicant.
Ms. P. N. Dabholkar , APP for the State.
Mr. Yogesh Ghodake (PSI) i/b. IO-Mukta Phadtare,
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J VACATION COURT DATED: 11th May, 2023
PC:-
438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C’).
Amol D. Nawale
1
the said crime. She has been informed by the police officer present in the
Court. Therefore, according to her, the present Anticipatory Bail Application does not survive.
(RAJESH S. PATIL,J.)
2
Amol D. Nawale
Nasreen Abdul Razzaq Qadri
The State Of Maharashtra
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
