Disposed
Parijat Shrikant Nandedkar v. Shivangi Vikas Deshpande and 3 Ors.
Bombay HCS/392/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
( P.A.) ININ
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P1.COMS.392.19.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT
( P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.392 OF 2019
Parijat Shrikant Nandedkar..Plaintiff
Versus
Shivangi Vikas Deshpande and Ors...Defendants
Ms. Ketki Gadkari, Advocate for Plaintiff.CORAM:MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE:MARCH 10, 2023
P.C.:
1. Mentioned. Not on Board. Taken on Board.
2. Perused the praecipe dated 10.03.2023.
3. Heard Ms. Gadkari, learned Advocate for Plaintiff.
4. Ms. Gadkari, learned Advocate for Plaintiff has placed on record
instructions received from the Plaintiff which are taken on record andmarked ‘ X ’ for identification.5. In view of those instructions, the Suit is allowed to be withdrawn.
6. Court fee be refunded as per Rules to the Plaintiff.
7. With above directions, Suit is disposed.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed SONALI by SONALISATISH KILAJE SATISH Date: 2023.03.13 KILAJE 14:18:10+0530
1 of 1
MILIND N. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court