Chitra Neelkanth Karkhanis v. Mahesh Prabhakar Dewoolkar
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a one-line order accepting that amendments were made and a settlement agreement was executed between parties. The court directed decree of the suit based on the consent terms and dismissed pending applications.
What did the court decide?
Suit decreed based on filed consent terms; undertakings accepted; applications disposed of.
What the court decided
2_S_35_20.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 35 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1944 OF 2019 IN SUIT NO. 35 OF 2020
Chitra Neelkanth Karkhanis … Plaintiff/Applicant
vs.
Mahesh Prabhakar Dewoolkar (since deceased) Through legal heirs:
Uma Mahesh Dewoolkar and others … Defendants/Respondents
Mr. Nitin G. Raut for plaintiff/applicant.
Ms. Chitra Neelkanth Karkhanis, plaintiff/applicant present in person.
Ms. Uma Mahesh Dewoolkar, defendant No.1A and Ms. Pooja Mahesh Dewoolkar, defendant No.1C present in person.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 20th SEPTEMBER, 2023
P.C. :
. By order dated 07.09.2023, this Court had allowed Interim Application (Lodging) No. 36352 of 2022 and consequential amendments were to be carried out. This Court is informed that the amendments were carried out in the prescribed period of time.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Chitra Neelkanth Karkhanis
- respondent
Uma Mahesh Dewoolkar
- respondent
Pooja Mahesh Dewoolkar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court