An interim application and a suit were disposed of based on consent terms executed by the parties in court, which were accepted by the learned judge.
Suit and Interlocutory Application disposed of in terms of Consent Terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14 (A).ial.36574.22.doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 36574 OF 2022
WITH
SUIT (L) NO. 35417 OF 2022
Rashida Fakhruddin Rajkotwala and Ors...Applicants
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:
Rashida Fakhruddin Rajkotwala and Ors...Plaintiffs
Versus
Shabbir Asgerali Rajkotwala..Defendant
Mr. Mehul Thakker for PlaintiffsMs. Karishma Shirke a/w. Ms. Alfiya Palitanwale for DefendantCORAM:MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE:MARCH 23, 2023.
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Thakker, learned Advocate for Plaintiffs and Ms. Shirke, learned Advocate for Defendant.
2. Parties have tendered Consent Terms and compromised. Copy of the Consent Terms dated 23.03.2023 is taken on record and marked
“X” for identification.3. Parties who have executed the Consent Terms are present in Court. Consent Terms are signed by the learned Advocate for Plaintiff; Plaintiff No.1; Plaintiff No.2; Plaintiff No.3; learned Advocate for Defendant. Defendant is handicapped in his left writing hand and therefore has put his left hand thumb impression which has been
Corrected / Modified Order as per Speaking to the Minutes of Order dated 27.03.2024. 1 of 9
14 (A).ial.36574.22.doc
identified by both the learned Advocates. He is present in Court before
me and confirms execution of the Consent Terms.
4. For convenience, the scanned copy of the Consent Terms running
into 8 pages is reproduced below for reference :Corrected / Modified Order as per Speaking to the Minutes of Order dated 27.03.2024. 2 of 9
14 (A).ial.36574.22.doc
Corrected / Modified Order as per Speaking to the Minutes of Order dated 27.03.2024. 3 of 9
14 (A).ial.36574.22.doc
Corrected / Modified Order as per Speaking to the Minutes of Order dated 27.03.2024. 4 of 9
14 (A).ial.36574.22.doc
Corrected / Modified Order as per Speaking to the Minutes of Order dated 27.03.2024. 5 of 9
14 (A).ial.36574.22.doc
Corrected / Modified Order as per Speaking to the Minutes of Order dated 27.03.2024. 6 of 9
14 (A).ial.36574.22.doc
Corrected / Modified Order as per Speaking to the Minutes of Order dated 27.03.2024. 7 of 9
14 (A).ial.36574.22.doc
Corrected / Modified Order as per Speaking to the Minutes of Order dated 27.03.2024. 8 of 9
14 (A).ial.36574.22.doc
5. The Undertakings given in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings given to this Court.
6. Suit is disposed of in terms of the above Consent Terms.
7. In view of the disposal of the Suit, Interlocutory application also
stands disposed.8. Refund of Court fees as per rules.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Corrected / Modified Order as per Speaking to the Minutes of Order dated 27.03.2024. 9 of 9
Rashida Fakhruddin Rajkotwala and Ors
Shabbir Asgerali Rajkotwala
MILIND N. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court