The High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 9598 of 2016 by directing its simplicitor withdrawal on the application of the petitioners and without objection from the respondents.
simplicitor withdrawal of the petition
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17-WP-9598-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9598 OF 2016
SHAKUNTALA ARVIND GOKHALE & ORS.)...PETITIONERS
V/s.
SANDHYA CHINTAMANI GOKHALE & ORS.)...RESPONDENTS
Mr. Bharat Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. Chetan Yadav i/b. Mr. Dinesh Rane, Advocate for the
Respondent No.6.
Mr. S.D.Rayrikar, AGP for the Respondent No.8 – State.
CORAM:ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE:19th DECEMBER 2022
P.C.:
1 Mr. Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, states that the petition be disposed of by directingsimplicitor withdrawal of the petition.
2 Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection.3 The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
avk 1/1
ARTI VILAS KHATATE Digitally signed byARTI VILASKHATATEDate: 2022.12.1915:56:48 +0530
SHAKUNTALA ARVIND GOKHALE & ORS.
SANDHYA CHINTAMANI GOKHALE & ORS.
ABHAY AHUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court