Writ petition was dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn by the High Court of Bombay. All interim and ad-interim orders were vacated.
Petition dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn; all interim and ad-interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-ASWP-8571-2021.DOC
Ashwini
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8571 OF 2021
Dadaso Shankar Chormule …Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors …Respondents
Mr Prasad Avhad , i/b Kuldeep V Nikam, for the Petitioner. Mr Swapnil Telang , i/b Umesh Mankapure, for Respondent No. 5. Mr AA Kumbhakoni, AG , with PP Kakade, GP, Akshay Sinde ‘B’ Panel Counsel & KS Thorat, AGP, for Respondent-State.
CORAM G.S. Patel & Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ. DATED: 5th April 2022
PC:-
ASHWINI HULGOJI GAJAKOSH
Digitally signed by ASHWINI HULGOJI GAJAKOSH Date: 2022.04.06 19:33:15 +0530
1. At the request of the learned Advocate for the Petitioner, Petition is dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn.
2. All interim and ad-interim orders stand vacated forthwith.
(Madhav J. Jamdar, J)
(G. S. Patel, J)
Page 1 of 1 5th April 2022
Dadaso Shankar Chormule
The State of Maharashtra
G. S. Patel
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
