Mr. Shailesh Shetty v. Mr. Ralph Sujay Kotian
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Bombay dismissed a writ petition challenging a revision order under Section 44 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, which confirmed a previous order directing eviction and compensation. The court noted that while possession was delivered, no evidence of compensation deposit was placed on record, resulting in nothing surviving in the petition.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition stood dismissed as nothing survived in the petition due to lack of proof of compensation deposit.