pendency of revision application the matter was sent for mediation,
however, the mediation had failed. The revision applications were
rejected. In the year - 2014 the Petitioners moved an application
for returning the complaint. The said application was rejected on
7th November, 2014. Repeated adjournments were sought on one or
the other pretext. The Petitioners preferred an application on 20th
May, 2015 for De-exhibiting the documents. The application was
rejected on 28th August, 2015. Applications were moved for
repeated adjournments. On 18th May, 2018 affidavit of evidence of
Mrs. Mahima Mirani was filed. The affidavit of Respondent No.1
consisted of amended purchase orders of accused, goods received
notes, communications received under RTI from office of Income
Tax, Central Excise etc. The accused moved an application
objecting the affidavit of complainant and Respondent No.1. The
application was rejected on 12th March, 2019. On 14th May, 2019,
the accused moved an application for adjournment. The said
application were disposed of on 14th May, 2019. The learned
Magistrate in order dated 14th May, 2019 had observed that
complaint is filed in 2011. After filing the examination in chief
affidavit, the accused had tried to prolong the matter on one count
or other. The accused was directed to keep his well instructed
Advocate present on the next date and complete cross examination