Disposed

Amruta D/O Appasaheb Kadam v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Medical Education and Drugs, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC17 Mar 2022WP/830/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition regarding dispute over BAMS college fees. Court directed college to submit documents to university for degree issuance, entrusting fee reconciliation to the university registrar upon petitioner undertaking to accept reconciliation decision.

What did the court decide?

Respondent college to submit documents for degree within two weeks; petitioner to file undertaking accepting registrar's fee decision.

Amruta D/O Appasaheb Kadam Vs State of Maharashtra… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

WP 830.2022

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.830 OF 2022

¶6

Amruta Appasaheb Kadam ... Petitioner

¶7

Versus -

¶8

State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents

¶9

Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for Petitioner.

¶10

Shri A.B. Moon, Advocate for Respondent No.3.

¶11

Shri A.S. Fulzele, Additional Government Pleader for Respondent No.1.

¶12

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.

¶13

DATE : 17 MARCH 2022

¶14

P.C. :

¶15

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶16

The dispute that is sought to be raised before us by the Petitioner is regarding the payment of fees. According to the

¶17

2 WP 830.2022

¶18

Petitioner, the Petitioner was liable to pay an amount of H.6,77,250/- for the entire course of B.A.M.S. conducted by Respondent No.3-College and that the Petitioner has paid H.6,34,750/- which included the charges for hostel from first year to fourth year at H.2,25,000/-, which facility the Petitioner never availed. According to Respondent No.3, the Petitioner is liable to pay H. 9,79,200/- and the balance amount due from the Petitioner is H.2,20,250/-. For non payment of these dues, Respondent No.3 is not forwarding the necessary documents to Respondent No.2-University for issuance of provisional degree certificate.

¶19

It is Respondent No.2-University which will issue the provisional degree certificate. Therefore, we entrust the responsibility for resolving this issue as regards the arrears, if any, to be paid by the Petitioner, upon the Registrar of Respondent No.2-Health University who will call the Petitioner or guardian of the Petitioner and representative of Respondent No.3 to reconcile the accounts.

¶20

We also direct Respondent No.3 to submit the necessary documents to Respondent No.2 for the purpose of issuance of a provisional degree certificate to the Petitioner. The documents be submitted to Respondent No.2 within period of

¶21

3 WP 830.2022

¶22

two weeks and Respondent No.2 shall issue the provisional degree certificate within period of a week thereafter.

¶23

This is conditional upon the Petitioner submitting an affidavit/undertaking in this Court that the Petitioner will accept the decision of the Registrar as regards the balance fees if payable. If the said fee is not payable to Respondent No.3, Respondent No.2 Registrar will be entitled to call the degree certificate. Similarly, learned Counsel for Respondent No.3 accepts that if Respondent No.2-Registrar holds that there are no dues payable then Respondent No.3 will also accept the said decision.

¶24

The undertaking to be filed within period of three weeks and copy of the same be given to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

¶25

No further orders are required. Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶26

Respondent No.2 is not represented before us. Apart from Registry sending the order to Respondent No.2, Respondent No.3 and the Petitioner will send the copy of this order to Respondent No.2-Registrar.

¶27

(ANIL L. PANSARE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) Deshmukh

¶28

SANDEEPCHANDRASHEKHARDESHMUKH Digitally signed bySANDEEPCHANDRASHEKHARDESHMUKHDate: 2022.03.2118:45:52 +0530

Amruta D/O Appasaheb Kadam v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Medical Education and Drugs, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amruta D/O Appasaheb Kadam v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Medical Education and Drugs, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Charandas Sambhaji Bobde Vs M.S.R.T.C. Thru. Vice Chairman and M.D. and Anor.

Afzal Zaheen Khan and Others Vs Nirmal Urban Co-Op. Bank Ltd. Nagpur through Its Authorized Officer and Others

Rachana D/O Bhauraoji Meshram Vs the Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Kalmeshwar, Nagpur and Others

Pandurang Ramrao Londhe and Another Vs State of Maharashtra, through the Ministry of Social Justice and Tribal Welfare Dept. Mumbai and or

Rahul S/O Babanrao Deshmukh Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Principal Secretary (State Excise), Mumbai and Another

Wave, a Partnership Firm, Nagpur through Authorized Partner, Kumar S/O Washi Chugani and Others Vs the Assistant General Manager, Bank of Baroda, Nagpur and Another