This petition was declared infructuous as the petitioner was already dismissed from service under Section 56(2)(h) of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act on 28.01.2022 before the court could hear the matter.
Petition declared infructuous and disposed of; liberty to challenge dismissal order retained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
940WP8256.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8256 OF 2021
Ramdas Chimaji Dhotre
….Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Another
….Respondents
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. T.M. Venjane AGP for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. H.V. Patil
CORAM : A.S. GADKARI AND S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE : 03.02.2022
P.C. :
[S.G. MEHARE, J.] [A.S. GADKARI, J.]
SPC
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramdas Chimaji Dhotre
The State of Maharashtra
Another
A.S. GADKARI
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court