Disposed

Solapur Municipal Corp. , Thru Commissioner and Anr. v. Park Choupati Khadya Padarth Vikrete Kalyankari Sanstha(Reg.) Thru President and Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC24 Jan 2022WP/720/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought dismissal of a civil suit initiated by respondents, intending to proceed via Section 81-B of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act. With no objection from respondents, the High Court disposed of both the writ petition and the underlying civil suit.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition and Regular Civil Suit No.956 of 2017 are disposed of.

Solapur Municipal Corp. , Thru Commissioner and Anr. Vs… — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

(17)-WP-720-22.doc .

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

Digitally signed by BALAJI BALAJIGOVINDRAO GOVINDRAOPANCHAL PANCHAL Date: 2022.01.24 16:33:36 +0530

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.720 OF 2022

¶5

Solapur Municipal Corporation Solapur
and Anr. ..Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

Park Choupati Khadya Padarth Vikrete
Kalyankari Sanstha and Ors. ..Respondents

¶8

Mr. Vishwanath Patil a/w Ankit Lodha and Kewal Ahya, for the
Petitioners.

¶9

Mr. Surel Shah, for the Respondents.

¶10

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

¶11

 DATE : 24th JANUARY, 2022

¶12

P.C.

¶13

1.The respondents initiated Regular Civil Suit No.956 of
2017 against the present petitioners/defendants seeking permanent
injunction not to interfere in their business activity without
following due process of law.

¶14

2. In the said suit, application Exh.5 came to be allowed
vide impugned order dated 1st January, 2018 passed by District
Judge-2, Solapur in Misc. Civil Appeal No.166 of 2017.

¶15

3. The contentions of the learned counsel for the
petitioners are the aforesaid suit itself can be disposed of as the
petitioners intend to proceed against the respondents/plaintiffs in

¶16

BGP. 1 o f 2

¶17

(17)-WP-720-22.doc .

¶18

accordance with law particularly having regard to the provisions of
Section 81-B of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act.

¶19

4. The aforesaid proposition is not objected by the counsel
for the respondents.

¶20

5. That being so, the present writ petition stands disposed
of.

¶21

6. Regular Civil Suit No.956 of 2017 is accordingly
disposed of in view of statement of the petitioners made on
instructions that the respondents/plaintiffs shall be proceeded in
accordance with provisions of Section 81-B of the Maharashtra
Municipal Corporation Act.

¶22

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]

¶23

2 o f 2

¶24

BGP.

Solapur Municipal Corp. , Thru Commissioner and Anr. v. Park Choupati Khadya Padarth Vikrete Kalyankari Sanstha(Reg.) Thru President and Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Solapur Municipal Corp. , Thru Commissioner and Anr. v. Park Choupati Khadya Padarth Vikrete Kalyankari Sanstha(Reg.) Thru President and Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Yash Developers and Anr. Vs Shri. Prakash Yeshwant Vaity and Ors.

Archana Pushkar Dikshit Vs Mr Pushkar Sudhir Dikshit

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited Thr. Corporate Office Vs Smt. Kishori Manik Dube and Ors.

Jagannath Ramaji Gaikwad Thr. Poa Vishvanath Jagannath Gaikwad and Anr. Vs Vitthal Keshav Yewale

Shri. Dattatraya Rangnath Mali Alias Thorat and Ors. Vs Smt. Shakuntala Balkrishna Alias Balu Alias Shrikrishna Thorat and Ors.

Shri. Maqsood Mohammed Habib Ansari (Gaffar) and Ors. Vs Shri. Banarasilal Kesharmal Gambhir (Deleted) and Ors.