Disposed

M/S Sundaram Bnp Paribas Home Finance Ltd. through Its Authorized Officer Mr. Amol Raghunath Sutar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC16 Jun 2022WP/686/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of a writ petition by directing the Talathi, Jalna, to submit a report on the status of the secured property by June 30, 2022, to facilitate the District Collector in executing the SARFESI Act order.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent 4-Talathi, Jalna to submit a report on or before 30th June 2022 to enable respondent 2-District Collector to implement the order. Order disposed.

M/S Sundaram Bnp Paribas Home Finance Ltd… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

wp686.22.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 686 OF 2022

¶5

M/s Sundaram BNP Paribas Home Finance Ltd.

¶6

Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Maharashtra & others

¶9

Respondents

¶10

Mr. S. S. Panale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. B. Yawalkar, AGP for respondents No. 1 to 6.

¶11

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.

¶12

DATE : 16^th JUNE, 2022.

¶13

PER COURT :

¶14

The petitioner has put forth prayer clause ‘B’ which reads

¶15

as under :-

¶16

B) By issuing Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Orders or Directions in the like nature the respondent No. 2 to 6 may kindly be directed to execute the Order dated 14.01.2021 passed u/s 14 of the SARFESI Act, in Case No. 181/2020 of the SARFAESI Act and to take physical possession of the secured assets viz. All that piece and parcel of the property i.e. Plot No. 16, CTS No. 5377/E-16, Survey No. 27, Burhan Nagar, Near Sadar Bazar, Jalna, District Jalna, with directions to the

¶17

wp686.22.odt

¶18

concerned Police Station to grant police assistance for taking physical possession of the secured assets.

¶19

The District Collector has issued an order dated 14^th January, 2021, considering the verdict of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The Talathi has tendered a report dated 10^th March, 2022, which is a panchanama indicating that the Judgment Debtor / borrower has sold the same land on 3^rd August, 2018 to four persons who have occupied the said premises and are in possession.

¶20

Section 14(1) of the Act would indicate that the District Collector can execute the order passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 14 of the Act.

¶21

In view of the above, this petition is disposed off with a direction to respondent No. 4 – Talathi, Jalna, to immediately submit a report to the District Collector, on or before 30^th June, 2022. Thereafter, respondent No. 2 – District Collector shall initiate such

¶22

wp686.22.odt

¶23

¶24

steps as are permissible in law to ensure that his order dated 14^th January, 2021 is implemented in letters and spirit.

¶25

( ANIL L. PANSARE ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE ) Judge Judge

¶26

dyb

M/S Sundaram Bnp Paribas Home Finance Ltd. through Its Authorized Officer Mr. Amol Raghunath Sutar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Sundaram Bnp Paribas Home Finance Ltd. through Its Authorized Officer Mr. Amol Raghunath Sutar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Govinda Sonawane and Others Vs Sujata Saunik Additional Chief Secretary and Others

Ambadas Keshav Misal and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Maharashtra Rajya Aids Niyantran Karmachari Kalyan Sanghatana through Its General Secretary Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Others

Ganesh Chandrakant Ingle Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Gorakshanath Damodhar Varpe Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sanjay Purushottam Kshirsagar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others