Disposed

Janardhan Rajaram More v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC6 Jul 2022WP/6802/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ for mutation and supplementary 7/12 extract based on a Pot Hissa measurement. The Court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders by the specified date.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No. 5 to consider the representation in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders on or before 15th September 2022.

Janardhan Rajaram More Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

wp 6802.22.odt

¶2

bsb

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 6802 OF 2022

¶5

Janardhan Rajaram More

¶6

....Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Maharashtra and others

¶9

....Respondents

¶10

Mr. Kishor R. Doke, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, A.G.P. for respondent nos 1 to 8.

¶11

CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, C.J. & RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

¶12

DATED : JULY 06, 2022.

¶13

PER COURT :

¶14

. The petitioner has put forth prayer clauses ‘B’ and ‘C’ as under :

¶15

B. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction in the like nature and direct the Ld. Tahsildar and Ld. Talathi, to take mutation as per the Pot Hissa measurement conducted by the Ld. S.L.R. Washi, and to prepare supplementary 7/12 extract as in respect of share of petitioner in Sy. No. 1, situated at village Pardi, Tq. Washi, Dist. Osmanabad.

¶16

¶17

wp 6802.22.odt

¶18

C. By issuing writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions in the like nature; the respondent authorities may kindly be directed to prepare andissue supplementary 7/12 extract in respect of land Sy. No. 1, situated at Village Pardi, as per the Pot Hissa measurement conducted by the Ld. S.L.R. and report dated 19/11/2018.

¶19

We have considered the submissions of the learned advocate for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents/state.

¶20

There is no dispute that the representation made by the petitioner to the Sub Divisional Committee at the taluka level and received by the said authority on 31.01.2022, can be decided in the light of the Government Resolution dated 18^th January, 2013.

¶21

In view of the above, this petition is disposed of. We direct respondent No. 5 to consider the said representation in accordance with the procedure laid down in law and pass appropriate orders on or before 15^th September 2022.

¶22

No costs.

¶23

[ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ] [ CHIEF JUSTICE ]

¶24

Janardhan Rajaram More v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Janardhan Rajaram More v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaikh Shafiq Saleh Mahmad and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Others

Satish Raosaheb Deshmukh Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Anant Baburao Golait Gahilot Vs the State Election Commission of Maharashtra and Others

Sandesh Suryabhan Wetal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Adivasi Vikas Vibhag Karmachari Sanghatana Thr Its Project President Nitin Kashinathrao Salunke Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sayed Sohel Sayed Mehmood Vs the State of Maharashtra