Disposed

Gaurav Rajesh Chourasiya v. State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Revenue and Forst Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC1 Nov 2022WP/6784/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a direction to release a seized vehicle and quash notices issued under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The Court directed the Sub Divisional Officer to expedite the hearing and dispose of the matter considering the reply filed. The petition was disposed on these terms.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed on direction to S.D.O. to hear the matter on 04.11.2022 and pass appropriate order.

Gaurav Rajesh Chourasiya Vs State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

WP-6784-2022

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.6784 OF 2022

¶5

{Gaurav Rajesh Chourasiya ..Vrs.. State of Maharashtra and Ors.}

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.

¶7

Shri A. R. Ingole, Advocate for the Petitioner.

¶8

Ms H. N. Jaipurkar, AGP for the Respondents.

¶9

CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J. DATE : 1 st NOVEMBER, 2022 .

¶10

. This is a petition seeking direction of this Court to the Tahsildar and Sub Divisional Officer (S.D.O.), Tiroda, District Gondia to release the vehicle bearing No.MH-35-AJ3101, which has been seized under Section 48(8) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Learned counsel for the Petitioner also seeks quashing and setting aside of the notices dated 22.09.2022 and 27.09.2022, issued to the Petitioner.

¶11

Ms Jaipurkar, learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the matter is pending for reply before S.D.O., who will pass an order after hearing the Petitioner.

¶12

Shri Ingole, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the reply has already been filed, but not considered by the S.D.O. and now a second show cause notice dated 27.09.2022 has been issued. He would submit that the Petitioner’s livelihood is dependent on the seized vehicle and if the same is not released, there will be grave injustice caused to the Petitioner.

¶13

WP-6784-2022

¶14

¶15

Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties, this Court is of the view that the interests of justice would be served, if the S.D.O., who has seized the vehicle, hears the matter expeditiously after considering the reply filed by the Petitioner.

¶16

Let the matter be heard by the S.D.O. on 04.11.2022 and an appropriate order be passed in accordance with law after hearing the parties and after considering the submissions made by them. Petition accordingly stands disposed in above terms.

¶17

All to act on an authenticated copy of this order.

¶18

(JUDGE)

¶19

TAMBE

¶20

Digitally Signed By:ASHISH ASHOKRAO TAMBE Personal Assistant to Hon'ble JUDGE Signing Date:01.11.2022 15:41

Gaurav Rajesh Chourasiya v. State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Revenue and Forst Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gaurav Rajesh Chourasiya v. State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Revenue and Forst Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Yusuf Abdul Hakim Vs Ashok Himmatrao Gade and Others

V.I.D.C., Thr. Its Executive Engineer, Upper Wardha Dam Division Amravati Vs Sulochana Jangluji Nandurkar (Dead) Thr. Lrs. Dashrath Jangluji Nandurkar and 2 Others

National Insurance Co. Ltd., through Its Branch Manager, Khamgaon Vs Smt. Vandana Wd/O. Shankar Chavhan and Others

Invent Asset Securitization and Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. vs Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. and Anr.

Rameshwar Ganeshprasad Pathak Vs Swapnil R. Shrawankar, Secty. C.E.O. Shri Bahhudeshiya Gramin Vikas Shikshan Sanstha and Others

Ganesh S/O Waman Waghmare and Another Vs Union of India, through the General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai Cst