The High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous because both parties agreed that the unused transformer and its supporting poles were already removed as prayed for in the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11-ASWP-6763-2022.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6763 OF 2022
Aajay Anivasay …Petitioner
Versus
Maharshtra State Electricity Distribution Co Ltd …Respondent through Executive Engineer Pune
Mr Aajay Anivasay , Petitioner in person is present. Mrs Anjali RS Baxi , for the Respondent.
SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE
Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2022.11.17 15:47:04 +0530
CORAM G.S. Patel & Gauri Godse, JJ. DATED: 17th November 2022
PC:-
1. The Petition is infructuous since both sides agree that the remaining supporting poles for the installed transformer were also removed around 10th November 2022. Prayer (a) of the Petition at page 10 seeks a mandamus to “immediately eradicate the unused transformer”.
2. In view of what is agreed before us, the Petition appears to be infrucutuous, the said ‘eradication’ having been taken place.
3. The Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(Gauri Godse, J)
(G. S. Patel, J) [{
Page 1 of 1
17th November 2022
Aajay Anivasay
Maharshtra State Electricity Distribution Co Ltd
G.S. Patel
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
