“3. Considering the rival contention of both the sides. So also I have gone through the record of case in hand and document produced from both the sides. It is also admitted fact on record that, second appeal is prefer before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. The present execution proceeding is pending for cross examination of decree holders witness. The original decree is in respect of perpetual injunction passed against judgment debtor. It is not case of the decree holders that, they are required possession of the suit property from the judgment debtor. I have carefully perused the contents of application from it appears that, it is no where contended by the decree holders on which date they have intend to plant the grapes in the suit property. So also they have not filed any map of measurement of the suit property to fence the suit property. As per the law, if defendants disobey the order of court or to cause breach of injunction that time decree holders having remedy to filed contempt petition before the court and prayer for detention of judgment debtor or to attach his property. In the present case in hand it is no where contended by the decree holders on which date the judgment
