The petitioner sought leave to withdraw Writ Petition No. 6167 of 2022. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. This concludes the matter. No legal principle or substantive ruling is articulated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 6167.22
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6167 OF 2022
The Suburaban Education Society Through its Secretary Jayant Sadashivrao Lalsare
.. Petitioner
Versus
Neeta Prabhakar Lonikar and others .. Respondents
Shri Vitthal G. Salgare, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri M. S. Choudhari, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri S. Y. Mahajan, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 17TH OCTOBER, 2022.
FINAL ORDER :
. Mr. Salgare, the learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions from his client seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
bsb/Oct. 22
The Suburaban Education Society Through its Secretary Jayant Sadashivrao Lalsare
Neeta Prabhakar Lonikar
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
