Criminal: The High Court at Bombay dismissed the public interest litigation filed for amendment of written statement in a civil suit, holding the court below was justified but allowing fresh proceedings after a revenue writ decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IRESHSIDDHARAM Digitally signed by IRESHSIDDHARAM MASHALDate: 2022.03.03 15:28:22 MASHAL +0530
16wp61-22.doc
ISM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 61 OF 2022
SHRI BABAN DADABHAU DHOBLE & ORS. …. PETITIONERS.
V/s.
SHRI PIRAJI RAKMAJI DHOBLE & ORS. ….RESPONDENTS.
Mr. Avinash B. Avhad, Advocate for the Petitioners.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE: MARCH 02, 2022.
P.C.:
amendment to the written statement are based on subsequent development, viz. mutation entry based on which the suit claim was
1/2
16wp61-22.doc
lodged, has underwent change in the appeal proceedings.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for amendment of written statement based on subsequent mutation entries was rightly rejected in light of a stay order on the suit.
Shri Baban DadabhaU Dhoble & Ors.
Shri Piraji RakhmajI Dhoble & Ors.
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
