Petitioner, having already received pensionary benefits, lacked a cause of action and sought leave to withdraw the writ petition unconditionally, which was granted.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition unconditionally.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp6070.19
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
918 WRIT PETITION NO.6070 OF 2019 PRADNYA PRAMOD KULKARNI VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Mr. Mahesh C. Swami, Advocate for petitioner; Mr. A.B. Dhongade, Advocate for respondent no.1; Mr. S.A. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent nos.2 to 4
CORAM : A.S. GADKARI
AND
S. G. MEHARE, JJ. DATE : 4th February, 2022
P.C.
(S. G. MEHARE, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
amj
PRADNYA PRAMOD KULKARNI
THE UNION OF INDIA
OTHERS
A.S. GADKARI
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
