Partly allowed

Vijay Ajabrao Bodhare v. Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nagpur and Another

Bombay HC5 Jul 2022WP/583/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought directions for the decision on a representation regarding the repatriation of a surplus teacher to their original school. The court directed the respondent to decide the pending representation within eight weeks and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 15-11-2019 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

Vijay Ajabrao Bodhare Vs Education Officer… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

5-7-2022-WP-583-2019.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

Writ Petition No.583 of 2019 Vijay Ajabrao Bodhare Versus

¶5

Education Officer (Secondary),
Zilla Parishad, Nagpur, and another

¶6

Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders
and Registrar's order

¶7

Shri N.D. Khamborkar, Advocate for Petitioner.

¶8

Shri A.S. Fulzele, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent
Nos.1 and 2.

¶9

Shri V.A. Dhabe, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4.
Smt. B.P. Maldhure, Advocate for Respondent No.5.

¶10

CORAM: SUNIL B. SHUKRE & G.A. SANAP, JJ.
DATE : 5th JULY, 2022

¶11

1. Heard.

¶12

2.Shri Khamborkar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits
that the Government has now framed a policy, as per the Government
Resolution dated 2-8-2016, regarding repatriation of the surplus
teachers absorbed in another School, in the original School of such
teachers, as and when vacancies arise in the original School.
He further submits that in view of this policy, the petitioner has made
a representation dated 15-11-2019 to the respondent No.2 for his
repatriation to the original School and this representation is yet to be
decided. He, therefore, prays for a direction to the respondent No.2 to
decide the representation at the earliest.

¶13

3.We think that the purpose of this petition would be more than
served if appropriate directions are issued to the respondent No.2.

¶14

¶15

5-7-2022-WP-583-2019.odt

¶16

4. Accordingly, partly allowing the petition, we direct the respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 15-11-2019 made by the petitioner to him, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

¶17

5. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶18

 (G.A. SANAP, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.)

¶19

Lanjewar

¶20

Digitally Signed By :P D LANJEWAR Signing Date:05.07.2022 16:51

Vijay Ajabrao Bodhare v. Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nagpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Ajabrao Bodhare v. Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nagpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramila Bhushan Sangole and 2 Others Vs Bhushan Ram Sangole and 5 Others

Hinganghat Shikshan Sanstha, through Its President, Wardha and Another Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports, Mumbai and

Aditya S/O Yashwant Nannaware Vs Registrar, Sant Gadgebaba University, Amravati and Another

Sanjay Madhukar Waghade Vs State of Mah. Thr. Deputy Inspector General (Prisons) East Region Nagpur and Another

Bhagwati Infrastructure Partnership Firm Thr. Virendra Vijay Butolia and 2 Others Vs State of Mah. Thr. Commissioner of Police Nagpur City Nagpur Civil Lines Nagpur and 2 Others

Smt. Savitiridavi Premkumar Kapoor Vs State of Mah. Thr Its Secretary, Home Department Mumbai