The court disposed of a writ petition where the parties settled their dispute out of court. The settlement was taken on record and the matter was terminated based on the settlement.
The writ petition was disposed of in view of the settlement between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
38-wp-5685-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5685 OF 2021
Digitally signed NILAM by NILAM SANTOSH SANTOSHKAMBLE KAMBLE Date: 2022.12.02 11:36:31 +0530
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Thr. Divisional Traffic, Superintendent
...Petitioner
Versus
Raju Kupparav Malake ...Respondent
Mr.Vinod Sangikar for the Petitioner. Mr.V.G. Sareeram, for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.G. DIGE, JJ.
DATE : 1 DECEMBER 2022
P.C:-
. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for the Respondent.
(S.G. DIGE, J.)
N.S. Kamble page 1 of 1
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation
Raju Kupparav Malake
S.G. DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
