Petitioner association filed a writ petition which was subsequently withdrawn by the association instructing its counsel to withdraw the matter. The court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-oswp556-2020
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 556 OF 2020
Mumbai-Pune Taxi Owner’s Association …Petitioner V/s.
Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Transport & Ors. …Respondents
Ms. Kajal Gupta i/by Yatin R. Shah for the petitioner. Mrs. Uma Palsuledesai, Additional G.P. for the respondentState.
Mr. Rakesh L. Singh i/by M.V. Kini & Co. for respondent no. 4. Smt. Shehnaz V. Bharucha with Anand Sanap for respondent no. 6.
CORAM: DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE: MARCH 4, 2022
P.C.:
The learned advocate for the petitioner places on record a resolution dated 22nd September 2021 of the petitioning association instructing its advocate to withdraw the petition. A copy of the resolution is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
Accordingly, learned advocate for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by ATUL ATUL GANESH KULKARNI GANESH Date: KULKARNI 2022.03.04 16:12:08 +0530
Page 1 of 1
Mumbai-Pune Taxi Owner's Association
Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Transport
Dipankar Datta
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
