Disposed

Suresh Pandharinath Waghere v. Pimpri Chichwad Municipal Corporaration and Anr.

Bombay HC6 Jun 2022WP/5425/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bench disposed of three writ petitions challenging notices from Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation under the MRTP Act. The Court directed petitioners to file regularization applications online within two weeks. Upon filing, the Corporation must decide expeditiously, and no coercive action shall be taken against the structures until two weeks after the decision is communicated.

What did the court decide?

Regularization applications to be filed within two weeks; no coercive steps against structures until two weeks after decision on regularization is communicated.

Suresh Pandharinath Waghere Vs Pimpri Chichwad Municipal… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

1/2

¶2

501-wp-5430-2022.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.5430 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.5429 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.5427 OF 2022

¶5

Jetaram Malaji Choudhary v/s.

¶6

Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Anr.

...Petitioner

...Respondents

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.5426 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.5425 OF 2022

¶11

Suresh Pandharinath Waghere ...Petitioner v/s.

¶12

Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Anr. ...Respondents

¶13

Mr.T.D.Deshmukh i/b Mr.Sagar Kursija for the Petitioners. Mr.Deepak R.More with Mr.Shivram A.Gawade for the RespondentCorporation.

¶14

Mr.Narendra Waghare, nephew of Mr.Suresh Pandharinath Waghere, Petitioner in WP/5426/2022 is present in Court.

¶15

CORAM : A.A. SAYED &

¶16

ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.

¶17

DATED : 06 JUNE 2022

¶18

P.C.:

¶19

The Petitions are filed challenging the Notices dated 13-042022 issued by the Respondent-Corporation under section 55 of the MRTP Act.

¶20

Learned Counsel for the Respondent-Corporation states that the subject structures are within the blue line under DC Regulations. Learned

1/2

Uday.P.Kambli

2/2

501-wp-5430-2022.doc

Counsel for the Petitioners, however, states that there is no mention in the notices that the subject structures are falling within the blue line.

¶26

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, states that the Petitioners are in the process of filing Regularization Applications online and the same shall be filed within two weeks from today.

¶27

In the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, we dispose of the Petitions by passing the following order:

¶28

O R D E R

¶29

(i) We record the statement of the learned Counsel for the Petitioners that the Regularization Applications shall be filed online by the Petitioners within two weeks from today;

¶30

(ii) If such Regularization Applications are filed, the same shall be disposed of by the Respondent-Corporation expeditiously and the decision on the same shall be communicated to the Petitioners.

¶31

(iii) Until the Regularization Applications are decided and for a period of two weeks from the date of communication of the decision to the Petitioners on the Regularization Applications, no coercive steps shall be taken against the structures of the Petitioners.

¶32

The Petitions are disposed of in the above terms.

(ABHAY AHUJA,J.)

(A.A.SAYED, J.)

2/2

Uday.P.Kambli

Suresh Pandharinath Waghere v. Pimpri Chichwad Municipal Corporaration and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Pandharinath Waghere v. Pimpri Chichwad Municipal Corporaration and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shree Siddeshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Maryadit Kumathe Vs State of Maharashtra Thr Its General Administrative Dept. and Ors.

Shree Siddeshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Maryadit Kumathe Vs State of Maharashtra Urban Development Dept. and Ors.

Shree Siddeshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Maryadit Kumathe Vs State of Maharashtra Thr Its General Administrative Dept. and Ors.

Mahesh Govind Mehra Vs Gangaram Gangaram Kokkula and 15 Ors.

Atc Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.

Bhakti Complex Sahakari Graharachna Sanstha Maryadit Thru Chairman Mr. Daivat Vasantrao Patil Vs the Commissioner Pimpri Chinchwad and Ors.