Dismissed

Vinayak Sham Shete v. Deputy Director / Secretary, Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur and Another

Bombay HC5 Sept 2022WP/4992/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this instant writ petition, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, disposed of the petition noting that the petitioner failed to produce the tribe validity certificate. The court granted time to produce documents, directed a vigilance enquiry, fixed timelines for issuance of the certificate, and directed the employer not to disturb the petitioner's service pending the committee's

What did the court decide?

Time granted till 3rd October 2022 to produce documents; Scrutiny Committee to conclude proceedings within three months; petitioner's service not to be disturbed pending decision.

Vinayak Sham Shete Vs Deputy Director /… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

wp4992.21.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.4992 OF 2021

¶6

Vinayak Sham Shete,

¶7

aged 44 years, occupation :

¶8

service, r/o B/16 Tushar Society, Tadiwala Road, Pune-411001.

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

Versus -

¶11

Deputy Director/Secretary, Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny Committee, Adiwasi Vikas Bhawan, Giripeth, Nagpur.

¶12

1. Colonel, Colonel Administration for Commandant and Managing Director, 512, Army Base Workshop, Kirkee, Pune-411003. ... Respondents

¶13

Shri S.P. Palshikar, Advocate for petitioner.

¶14

Shri M.J. Khan, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.1. Smt. M.R. Chandurkar, Advocate for respondent no.2.

¶15

CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, C.J. AND NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

¶16

DATED : SEPTEMBER 5, 2022

¶17

P.C. :

¶18

The petitioner has been appointed by the Army Base Workshop, Kirkee, Pune against a vacancy reserved for a

¶19

2 wp4992.21.odt

¶20

Scheduled Tribe candidate. Despite several opportunities having been extended to the petitioner to produce the tribe validity certificate, he has failed to do so. This resulted in a notice dated 7/9/2020 being issued by the Colonel, Col. Adm. for Comdt & MD, granting 60 days’ time to the petitioner to produce the tribe validity certificate, failing which he was threatened with, inter alia, removal from service as well as return of all benefits obtained from the Government.

¶21

It is not in dispute that the petitioner had applied for the tribe validity certificate and the Scrutiny Committee has called upon him to produce relevant documents in support of his claim.

¶22

Since Shri Khan, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent no.1, submits that the Scrutiny Committee is agreeable to consider the petitioner’s prayer for a tribe validity claim certificate within four months from date of receipt of the necessary documents, we see no reason to keep this writ petition pending any longer. The writ petition stands disposed of by the following order:

¶23

ORDER

¶24

(i) The petitioner is granted time till 3^rd October 2022 to produce all documents in support of his tribe claim.

¶25

(ii) The Scrutiny Committee shall conduct vigilance enquiry and furnish copy of the report of the

¶26

¶27

wp4992.21.odt

¶28

Vigilance Cell, if the same is adverse to the petitioner’s claim, to him within 72 hours of receipt of such report.

¶29

(iii) The Scrutiny Committee shall proceed to issue a validity certificate in the event the tribe claim of the petitioner is substantiated based on the documents produced by him and by the Vigilance Cell’s report. Should the Vigilance Cell’s report be adverse and the documents produced by the petitioner not substantiate the tribe claim, the Scrutiny Committee shall proceed to pass an appropriate reasoned order in accordance with law. (iv) In any case, the Scrutiny Committee shall conclude the proceedings before it within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the documents produced by the petitioner.

¶30

(v) In the event the petitioner produces the validity certificate within a fortnight of its receipt from the Scrutiny Committee, his services shall be continued by the employer. However, if the tribe claim of the petitioner is invalidated, the employer shall be at liberty to take such steps as are warranted according to law.

¶31

(vi) The petitioner’s service may not be disturbed till such time the Scrutiny Committee’s decision reaches the petitioner’s employer. The Scrutiny Committee shall, however, be free to forward its decision to such employer.

¶32

wp4992.21.odt

¶33

¶34

All contentions on merits are kept open. No costs.

¶35

(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶36

khj

¶37

Digitally Signed By:KAMAL HUNDRAJ JESWANI Signing Date:06.09.2022 16:28

Vinayak Sham Shete v. Deputy Director / Secretary, Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinayak Sham Shete v. Deputy Director / Secretary, Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil S/O Namdeo Khonde Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Collector, Wardha and Others

Vijay S/O Nanaji Ujjainkar Vs Keshav Payruji Shankarpale and Another

Rambhau S/O Gyanadev Giri Vs Union of India, through the General Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad

Parag Govind Joshi Vs State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, Department of Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Others

Pradip Dadarao Budhe Vs the Dy. General Manager-Cum-Appellate Authority, the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi and Ors.

M/S. Shree Gajanan Construction Company Thr. Partner, Shri. Vilas Sontakke Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Revenue and Forest Department, Mumbai and Another