The High Court of Bombay disposed of Writ Petition No. 49 of 2012 as infructuous due to the non-receipt of a required praecipe from the petitioners' side, with liberty to revive if it survives.
Petition disposed of as infructuous with liberty to revive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
239. WP 49-12.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 49 OF 2012
Somnath Makardhwaj Daundkar and Ors. … Petitioners versus The State Election Commission … Respondent
None for the petitioners. Mr. Y. D. Patil, AGP for the State.
CORAM: DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ. & ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE: DECEMBER 07, 2022.
P.C.:
1. This petition has been notified as per the list of matters as received from the office of the learned Government Pleader to have become infructuous. As per the office notice dated 29th November, 2022, the advocate for the petitioners was called upon to give a praecipe in advance in case the petition has not become infructuous. Such praecipe has not been received in regard to this petition. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous; however, with liberty to the petitioners to revive the petition in case something survives. 2. No costs.
Digitally signed by PRIYA PRIYA RAJESH RAJESH SOPARKAR SOPARKAR Date: 2022.12.09 10:58:52 +0530
1
prs
Somnath Makardhwaj Daundkar and Ors.
The State Election Commission
Dipankar Datta
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
