Disposed

Shailesh Gupta and Ors. v. Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. and Ors.

Bombay HC12 Sept 2022WP/4880/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a correction order where the High Court ordered rectification of errors in a previous order and judgment dated 12th September, 2022, regarding party names, case reference numbers, and specific legal terms.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 12th September, 2022, to be corrected on specific points including party names, case numbers, and references to the Recovery Officer versus DRT.

Shailesh Gupta and Ors. Vs Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. and Ors. — Bombay HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

spm 1 906-Wp-4885-2022.doc

¶2

Digitally signed by MULEY MULEY SHUBHAM SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO PRAVINRAO Date: 2022.09.19 10:22:15 +0530

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 4885 OF 2022

¶6

Sunil Gupta & Anr. …..Petitioners

¶7

Vs.

¶8

Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. & Ors. …..Respondents

¶9

WITH

¶10

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 11009 OF 2021

¶11

Asset Reconstruction Company India Ltd. …..Petitioner Vs. Sunil Gupta & Ors. …..Respondents

¶12

WITH

¶13

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 11010 OF 2021

¶14

Asset Reconstruction Company India Ltd. …..Petitioner

¶15

Vs.

¶16

Shailesh Gupta & Ors. …..Respondents

¶17

WITH

¶18

WRIT PETITION NO. 4880 OF 2022

¶19

Shailesh Gupta & Ors. …..Petitioners

¶20

Vs.

¶21

Asset Reconstruction Company India Ltd. & Ors. …..Respondents

¶22

Mr. Chirag Kamdar, Mr. Naren Nimbalkar, Mr. Harsh Salgia i/by Khaitan & Co. for Petitioner Nos.1 to 3 in WP 4885 of 2022, for Petitioner Nos.1 to 4 in WP 4880 of 2022, for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 in WP(L)11009 and for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 in WP(L)11010 of 2021.

¶23

CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & A. S. DOCTOR, JJ. DATE : 16^th SEPTEMBER, 2022

¶24

1/3

¶25

spm 2 906-Wp-4885-2022.doc

¶26

P.C.:-

¶27

In the order and judgment dated 12^th September, 2022, the

¶28

following corrections be made:-

¶29

Sr.	Present Order	Reference	Correction
No.
1.	“Shri Bahirat Gupta”	Page 4, Respondent No. 3, Name of Parties, W.P. (St.) No. 11009/2021	To be substituted with “Shri Bharat Gupta”
2.	“Writ Petition No. 4880 2002”	Para No. 1, lines 3 and 6, Page 7.	To be substituted with “Writ Petition No. 4880 of 2022”
3.	“…and Recovery Certificate dated 21st January 2010 issued by the Recovery Officer are hereby quashed and set aside.”	Para 67, line 3, Page 70	“issued by the Recovery Officer” to be substituted with “issued by the DRT”.
4.	“Writ Petition No. 4885 of 2022”	Para 75, lines 2 and 4, Pages 71 and 72.	To be substituted with “Writ Petition No. 4880 of 2022”.
5.	“Writ Petition No. 4885 of 2022”	Para 77, lines 1 and 4, Page 72.	To be substituted with “Writ Petition No. 4880 of 2022”.

¶30

2/3

¶31

spm 3 906-Wp-4885-2022.doc

¶32

6.	“…respondent nos. 1 to 3…”	Para 77,	To be substituted with
		line 4, Page 72.	“respondent nos. 1 to 4”.
7.	“..Appeal No. 117 of 2011.”	Para 77,	To be substituted with
		line 6, Page	“Appeal No. 118 of
		72.	2011”.

¶33

Rest of the order remains unaltered. Original order to be

corrected.

(A. S. DOCTOR, J.)

(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)

3/3

Shailesh Gupta and Ors. v. Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailesh Gupta and Ors. v. Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Rbl Bank Ltd. ( Earlier Known as the Ratnakar Bank Ltd. ) Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sai Kripa Confectioneries Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Homes 4 U Realtors Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sunil Gupta and Anr. Vs Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. and Ors.

Haresh Govindram Abhichandani Vs Union of India and Anr.