The High Court at Bombay dismissed two writ petitions after an order was issued in favor of the petitioners, rendering the petitions devoid of surviving grounds. No substantive legal reasoning is provided in this order.
None; petitions disposed of as orders issued in favor of petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CHANDERSEN SHIV
66.aw4359.19.doc
Date: 2022.07.14 13:53:15 +0530
Shiv
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4359 OF 2019
Dattatray Balaso Tengale… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.4356 OF 2019
Chitralekha Devidas Narsale… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Saurabh Pakale i/b Mr. S.S.Katkar for the Petitioner in both Petitions.
Mrs. S.S. Bhende AGP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Respondent Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
S. M. MODAK, JJ.
DATED : 11TH JULY 2022
P.C.:
1. The learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that subsequent to filing of these Petitions, the orders have been issued in favour of the Petitioner in both Petitions, as such nothing survives in the Writ Petitions.
2. In view of above, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.
(S. M. MODAK, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
1/1
Dattatray Balaso Tengale
Chitralekha Devidas Narsale
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
S. M. MODAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court