The High Court of Bombay granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the alternate remedy and disposed of the matter with no order as to costs.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906-ASWP-427-2022.DOC
Arun
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 427 OF 2022
Dhanshree Vilas Naik …Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal …Respondents Secretary & Ors
Mr Imtiyaz Patel , i/b Mohammed Shoeb Shaikh, for the Petitioner. Mr Dilip Bodake , with Shraddha Pawar, for Respondents Nos. 2 & 3. Mr SS Panchopor, AGP , for the Respondent-State.
CORAM G.S. Patel & Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ. DATED: 20th January 2022
PC:-
1. On instructions, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to avail of the alternate remedy.
2. Leave granted as prayed. The Petition is disposed of in these terms with no order as to costs.
Digitally
signed byARUN
ARUNRAMCHNDRA RAMCHNDRASANKPAL
SANKPAL Date:
2022.01.20
15:21:18
+0530
3. All contentions are kept open.
Page 1 of 2 20th January 2022
906-ASWP-427-2022.DOC
4. All concerned will act on production of a digitally signed copy of this order.
(Madhav J. Jamdar, J)
(G. S. Patel, J)
Page 2 of 2 20th January 2022
Dhanshree Vilas Naik
The State Of Maharashtra
G. S. Patel
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
