Petitioners in a writ petition did not wish to pursue the matter further and sought liberty to approach the appropriate forum, leading to withdrawal.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to approach appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Diksha Rane
Digitally signed URMILA by URMILAPRAMOD PRAMOD INGALE INGALE Date:2022.03.02 17:10:30 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 423 OF 2022
Dilip Bapusaheb Gaikwad & anr. ..Petitioners vs. Citi Financial Consumer Finance India Ltd. & ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Narendra Sharma for the petitioners.
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ &
M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : MARCH 1, 2022.
P.C. :
to pursue this writ petition any further and that they seek liberty of this Court to approach the appropriate forum for relief.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
1/1
Dilip Bapusaheb Gaikwad
Citi Financial Consumer Finance India Ltd.
Dipankar Datta
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
