Anil Raghunath Mhatre v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-4210-14-WP=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4210 OF 2014
Anil Raghunath Mhatre.. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
None for the petitioner
Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil for respondent no.2
CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV &
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.J.
DATED : 9th FEBRUARY, 2022
(Through Video Conferencing)
P.C.
1. None for the petitioner.
2. The learned APP has filed on record a report issued by the P.I. of Revdanda Police Station, which indicates that in the present case, the trial has commenced and two witnesses have been examined.
3. In view of this, the petition has become infructuous and stands disposed of.
(PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)
Digitally signed UDAY by UDAY SHIVAJI SHIVAJI JAGTAPDate: 2022.02.09 JAGTAP 11:55:41 +0530
1 of 1
Anil Raghunath Mhatre
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
Prithviraj K. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court