Court disposed of two writ petitions filed by Appasaheb Gangaram Waghmare and Ors. as withdrawn upon motion by learned counsel, while noting the suit is five years old and requiring expediting.
Both writ petitions were disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(14 & 15)-WP-395 & 396-22.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by BALAJI BALAJI GOVINDRAO GOVINDRAO PANCHAL PANCHAL Date: 2022.01.18 10:55:16 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO.395 OF 2022
Appasaheb Gangaram Waghmare
(Since deceased through Lrs)
Jayshree Appaso Waghmare and Ors. ..Petitioners
Versus
Rahin Shahajahan Tahasildar ..Respondent
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.396 OF 2022
Appasaheb Gangaram Waghmare
(Since deceased through Lrs)
Jayshree Appaso Waghmare and Ors. ..Petitioners
Versus
Ravikant Parampa Karadage and Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Pramod G. Kathane, for the Petitioners in both Writ Petitions.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 17th JANUARY, 2022
P.C.
1.Learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions made
motion for withdrawal of the petitions.
2. As such, both the petitions stand disposed of as withdrawn.
3. However, since the suit is almost five years old, hearing of
the same is expedited.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
BGP. 1 o f 1
Appasaheb Gangaram Waghmare (Since deceased through Lrs) Jayshree Appaso Waghmare and Ors.
Rahin Shahajahan Tahasildar
Ravikant Parampa Karadage and Ors.
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court