Writ petition filed by a petitioner seeking benefits from the Agricultural Produce Market Committee for which no statute is cited. The committee resolved to grant the benefits during the petition's pendency. The court disposed of the petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2(ii)-WP.3619.2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3619 OF 2022
Sambhaji Jayram Shrikhande} Petitioner versus The Chairman, Agricultural } Produce Market Committee, } Karjat and Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Vaibhav Jagdale for the petitioner. Mr. Vishal G. Salvi for respondents 1 and 2. Mr. B. V. Samant, AGP for Statd.
CORAM: DIPANKAR DATTA, C. J. & MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE: OCTOBER 19, 2022
P.C.:
1. During the pendency of this writ petition, Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Karjat, by a resolution dated 14th October 2022 has decided to extend the benefits to the petitioner, which he had claimed by instituting this writ petition.
2. Learned advocates appearing for the petitioner and the respondents 1 and 2 are ad idem that the purpose for which this writ petition has been instituted has worked itself out. 3. In such view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed of.
4. No costs.
5. The copy of the resolution dated 14th October 2022 shall be retained with the records.
SALUNKE J V
Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2022.10.20 10:57:23 +0530
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PS
Sambhaji Jayram Shrikhande
The Chairman, Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Karjat
Dipankar Datta
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
