Petitioner withdrew the writ petition alleging settlement. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1-aswp3457-2021
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3457 OF 2021 [
Idemitsu Lube India Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner
V/s.
Grocery Markets and Shops Board for Brihan Mumbai, Thane & Raigad District & Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Lancy D’Souza with Ms. Deepika Agarwal & Mr. V. M. Parkar, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rahul D. Oak for respondent nos. 1 and 2.
Ms. Pavitra Manish i/by Mr. Meelan Topkar for respondent no. 3.
CORAM: DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ. & MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 2022
P.C.:
1. Mr. D’Souza, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that a settlement has since been arrived at between the parties and in view of such settlement, which is placed on record, the petitioner does not wish to proceed with this writ petition any further.
2. The settlement forming part of the compilation shall be retained with the records.
3. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by ATUL ATUL GANESH GANESH KULKARNI KULKARNI Date: 2022.09.12 16:46:52 +0530
1
Idemitsu Lube India Pvt. Ltd.
Grocery Markets and Shops Board for Brihan Mumbai, Thane & Raigad District
Others
Dipankar Datta
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court