Mangala Pannalal Murkya Vs Omprakash Jagannathji Daga and Others

¶1

1

¶2

947wp3380.20

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

947 WRIT PETITION NO.3380 OF 2020

¶5

MANGALA PANNALAL MURKYA VERSUS

¶6

OMPRAKASH JAGANNATHJI DAGA AND OTHERS

¶7

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Barde Parag Vijay Advocate for Respondent No. 10 : Mr.Deshpande S.R. Advocate for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 : Mr.Yadkikar Amit A.

¶8

CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

¶9

DATE : 18.10.2022.

¶10

PER COURT :

¶11

The petitioner assails the order dated 08.01.2020 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Parbhani on the application Exh. 43. By that application the petitioner/plaintiff had sought impleadment of “Assistant General Manager, Stressed Assets, Management” as defendant to the suit. The petitioner’s application has been turned down on account of opposition by proposed defendant to that application.

¶12

It is a common ground that the State Bank of India has already been impleaded as defendant No. 9 to the suit and the proposed defendant has stepped into the shoes of the State Bank of India. The only ground on which the impleadment of applicant was opposed was the bar of jurisdiction under Section 34 of the

¶13

2 947wp3380.20

¶14

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002. The proposed defendant can raise objection of bar of jurisdiction once he impleaded to the suit.6 pt

¶15

To me, the proposed defendant appears to be a necessary party as he has stepped into the shoes of defendant No. 9.

¶16

Consequently, the order dated 08.01.2020 passed by the 4^th Civil Judge, Senior Division, Parbhani is set aside. Plaintiff’’s application at Exh. 43 is allowed in terms of prayer made therein. Needless to state that the proposed defendant would be entitled to raise all objections as available in law.

¶17

The petition is allowed to that extent. No costs.

¶18

( SANDEEP V. MARNE ) JUDGE

¶19

mahajansb/

Mangala Pannalal Murkya v. Omprakash Jagannathji Daga and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mangala Pannalal Murkya v. Omprakash Jagannathji Daga and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rolland Stanislaus Britto vs the State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors.

Dileep v Saptarshi and 2 Ors. vs Assistant Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai-H West Ward and 3 Ors.

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. through Branch Manager through Authorized Signatory Vs Mukinda Fakirrav Chaure and Others

Homeopathic College Beed Thr Its Authorized Trustee Nanasaheb Raosaheb Kakde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vilas Shankarrao Kulkarni and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra through Disrict Collector and Others

Mallinath Shivappa Patale Died through Lrs Revubai Mallinath Patale and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Collector and Others