Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking execution relief. Counsel stated the decree had been executed and the petition's purpose served. The court disposed of the petition accordingly without substantive adjudication.
Petition disposed of as purpose served by execution of decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 15-W.P.No.3225.2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3225 OF 2022
Hariom S/o Satyanarayan Bhoot
..VS..
The 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Yavatmal and another
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. Anup J. Gilda, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. N.S. Rao, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.1.
CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND
G.A. SANAP, JJ.
DATED : 19.09.2022
Mr. Anup J. Gilda, learned counsel for the petitioner states that decree has been executed and at least the purpose of this petition has been served.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of accordingly.
Kirtak
Digitally Signed By:KIRTAK BHIMRAO JANARDHAN Signing Date:19.09.2022 17:28
Hariom S/o Satyanarayan Bhoot
The 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Yavatmal
another
SUNIL B. SHUKRE
G.A. SANAP
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
