Disposed

Kartik Jogendar Pal v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Maha., Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC22 Jul 2022WP/2834/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Nagpur granted liberty to the petitioner to apply for a change of examination centre and file a grievance against victimization, directing the University and the Dean to decide these matters expeditiously within specified timelines.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to make application for change of examination centre and complaint; directions for decision within two days and eight weeks.

Kartik Jogendar Pal Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Its… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

WP.2834.22

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR.

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 2834/2022

¶5

Kartik Jogendra Pal ..Petitioner

¶6

versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra & others ..Respondents

¶8

….......................................................................................................... Mr. S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for Petitioner Mr.A.S. Fulzele, Addl. Government Pleader for Respondent No.1State

¶9

Mr.Abhijit Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 Mr A.S.Manohar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6,7,8 and 9

¶10

CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE & G.A. SANAP, JJ DATED : 22^nd July, 2022.

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

We have heard this matter for some time.

¶13

Mr. S.P. Bhandarkar, learned counsel for the petitioner

¶14

on instructions, submits that the petitioner would be making an application to the University for change of examination centre. He further states on instructions that the petitioner would also be making complaint /representation to the Dean of the Respondent No.6-Institution and also to the University regarding victimization of the petitioner and taking an appropriate action in the matter after conduct of due enquiry.

¶15

The proposals of the petitioner are worthy of consideration and, therefore, we grant liberty to the petitioner to make a suitable application seeking change of his examination centre

¶16

WP.2834.22

¶17

¶18

and also complaint /representation seeking enquiry into the grievances raised by the petitioner and taking of appropriate action depending upon the outcome of the enquiry.

¶19

Liberty is accordingly granted to the petitioner. In case the application for change of examination centre is made by the petitioner within two days, the same shall be decided by the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in accordance with law at the earliest and preferably on or before 29^th July, 2022.

¶20

As regards the complaint proposed to be made by the petitioner, we direct that if it is made within two days from the date of this order, the same shall be decided in accordance with law after making proper enquiry by the University as well as the Dean of Respondent No.6-Institution as expeditiously as possible and preferably within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the complaint. We clarify that the scope of the consideration of the grievances raised in the complaint, insofar as the University is concerned, shall be restricted to clause 71.13 read with clause 71.13.2.2 of the Ordinance No.1/2014.

¶21

The Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

¶22

[G.A. SANAP, J.]

¶23

sahare

¶24

Digitally Signed ByNARENDRA BHAGWANTRAO SAHARE Location: Signing Date:26.07.2022 13:11

Kartik Jogendar Pal v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Maha., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kartik Jogendar Pal v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Maha., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raja @ Amar S/O Dilip Parteki and Another Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Ambazari Nagpur

Shaikh Mohasin Shaikh Pashu Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso Ps Risod, Tah. Risod, Dist. Washim and Another

Bhavan S/O Mohan Gedam Vs Divisional Commissioner Nagpur Division Nagpur and Another

Manoj S/O Suresh Shivarkar Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Hingna Nagpur

Palash S/O Purushottam Darokar and 4 Others Vs State of Mah. Thr. Its Pso Ps Sitabuldi Nagpur and Another

Atul Keshaorao Bodkhe Vs Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati, Thr. Its Registrar, Amravati and Others