Partly allowed

Sujit Govindrao Mardode v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC6 Jan 2022WP/258/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In WP 258 of 2022, the petitionershoped for quashing of a show cause notice issued by the employer regarding pending validation proceedings since 2013. The High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad discontinued the notice and instructed the employer that all steps would be taken by the committee within two months after the petitioners'appearance on 01.02.2022. The writ petition was disposed without

What the court decided

AI extract

Sujit Govindrao Mardode Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

1 942-wp 258-2022.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 258 OF 2022

¶4

Sujit Govindrao Mardode

¶5

.. Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra and others

¶8

.. Respondents

¶9

Mr. Pratap V. Jadhavar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. S. Patil, Addl. G. P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

¶10

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
S. G. DIGE, JJ.

¶11

 DATED : 06th JANUARY, 2022.

¶12

PER COURT:-

¶13

.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the validation
proceeding is pending since the year 2013. The same is not yet
decided. The show cause notice is issued by the employer to submit
the validity or else services of the petitioner would be terminated.

¶14

2. The learned Addl. G. P. accepts notice for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and submits that the matter of the petitioner is ready and the same would be decided within a period of two (02) months from today.

¶15

3.The petitioner shall appear before the committee on 01.02.2022.
The committee shall thereafter decide the validation proceeding within
a period of two (02) months from the date of appearance of the
petitioner.

¶16

1 of 2

¶17

2 942-wp 258-2022.odt

¶18

4. The impugned notice is quashed and set aside.

¶19

5. The employer may take further course of action depending upon

¶20

the judgment that would be delivered by the committee in the validation proceeding.

¶21

6. Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶22

( S. G. DIGE )( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
 JUDGE JUDGE

¶23

P.S.B.

¶24

2 of 2

Sujit Govindrao Mardode v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sujit Govindrao Mardode v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sidheshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Maniknagar through Its Labour Officer Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Sanjeev Asaram Sulane Vs District Collector and Another

Anil Prabhakar Aundhekar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bharti Sanjay Amale Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Sumit Bhaurao Salunke Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Shaikh Aqeel Shaikh Jafar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others