Petitioner withdrew the Writ Petition; the Court disposed of the Writ Petition as withdrawn and discharged the rules, concurrently disposing of allied Civil Applications.
The Writ Petition was disposed of as withdrawn and the rules were discharged; connected Civil Applications were also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 2512.2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 WRIT PETITION NO.2512 OF 2012
WITH
CA/10435/2012
WITH
CA/10147/2016
BHAVSING FULSING BAINADE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Irale Patil D. R.
Advocate for Respondent No. 3: Mr. U. B. Bondar
...
CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
S. G. DIGE, JJ.
DATE:04th JANUARY, 2022
PER COURT:
1.The learned Counsel for the Petitioner
submits that he has received the written
instructions to withdraw the Writ Petition. The
communication received by the learned Counsel is
placed on record and the same is marked “X” for
identification.
2.In view of that, the Writ Petition is
disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged.
3.In view of disposal of the Writ Petition, the
Civil Applications are also disposed of.
[S. G. DIGE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
marathe
Bhavsing Fulsing Bainade
The State of Maharashtra and Others
S. V. Gngapurwala
S. G. Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court