This writ petition was disposed of after the respondents filed a return stating that the petitioners' grievance regarding land boundary was amicably resolved via a compromise panchnama dated 14.02.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
942-WP-2362-17.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2362 OF 2017
DINKAR GOVINDRAO MULAY AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE COLLECTOR AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Pradip K. Wagh
AGP for Respondents No.1 and 2 : Mrs. M. A. Deshpande
Advocate for Respondents No.3 to 5 : Mr. A. D. Aghav h/f.
Ms. Deepali D. Wagh
CORAM :A.S. GADKARI AND
S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE :15-02-2022
PER COURT :-
1. Learned Counsel appearing for respondents No.3 to 5 submitted
that, the grievance of the petitioners with respect to the boundary of
their land has been resolved amicably by the Members of
Grampanchayat and a panchnama dated 14.02.2022 has accordingly
been drawn.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner on instructions submitted
that, in view of the said compromise/panchnama dated 14.02.2022,
the grievance of the petitioners does not survive.
3. In view thereof, the Petition is disposed off.
rrd
Dinkar Govindrao Mulay and Others
The Collector Ahmednagar and Others
A.S. Gadkari
S.G. Mehare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court